One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Julian Burger, Adela‐Maria Isvoranu, Gabriela Lunansky, Jonas M B Haslbeck, Sacha Epskamp, Ria H. A. Hoekstra, Eiko I. Fried, Denny Borsboom, Tessa F. Blanken
Statistical network models describing multivariate dependency structures in psychological data have gained increasing popularity. Such comparably novel statistical techniques require specific guidelines to make them accessible to the research community. In this literature, researchers have previously provided tutorials guiding the estimation of networks and their accuracy. However, there is currently little guidance in determining what parts of the analyses and results should be documented in a scientific report. A lack of such reporting standards may foster researcher degrees of freedom and could provide fertile ground for questionable reporting practices. Here, we introduce reporting standards for network analyses in cross-sectional data, along with a tutorial and two examples. The presented guidelines are aimed at researchers as well as the broader scientific community, such as reviewers and journal editors evaluating scientific work. We conclude by discussing how the network literature specifically can benefit from such guidelines for reporting and transparency.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Burger, J., Isvoranu, A., Lunansky, G., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Epskamp, S., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Fried, E. I., Borsboom, D., & Blanken, T. F. (2022). Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471
Burger, Julian, et al. "Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data." Psychological Methods, vol. 28, no. 4, 2022, pp. 806–824, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471.
Burger, Julian, Adela‐Maria Isvoranu, Gabriela Lunansky, Jonas M B Haslbeck, Sacha Epskamp, Ria H. A. Hoekstra, Eiko I. Fried, Denny Borsboom, and Tessa F. Blanken. "Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data." Psychological Methods 28, no. 4 (2022): 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471.
Burger J., Isvoranu A., Lunansky G. [и др.] Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. // Psychological Methods. — 2022. — Vol. 28, № 4. — P. 806–824. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471
@article{burger2022reporting,
title = {{Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data.}},
author = {Julian Burger and Adela‐Maria Isvoranu and Gabriela Lunansky and Jonas M B Haslbeck and Sacha Epskamp and Ria H. A. Hoekstra and Eiko I. Fried and Denny Borsboom and Tessa F. Blanken},
journal = {Psychological Methods},
year = {2022},
volume = {28},
number = {4},
pages = {806--824},
doi = {10.1037/met0000471},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471}
}TY - JOUR AU - Burger, Julian AU - Isvoranu, Adela‐Maria AU - Lunansky, Gabriela AU - Haslbeck, Jonas M B AU - Epskamp, Sacha AU - Hoekstra, Ria H. A. AU - Fried, Eiko I. AU - Borsboom, Denny AU - Blanken, Tessa F. TI - Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. JO - Psychological Methods VL - 28 IS - 4 SP - 806 EP - 824 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/04/11 DO - 10.1037/met0000471 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.