One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Claudia D. van Borkulo, Riet van Bork, Lynn Boschloo, Jolanda Jacqueline Kossakowski, Pia Tio, Robert A. Schoevers, Denny Borsboom, Lourens Waldorp
Network approaches to psychometric constructs, in which constructs are modeled in terms of interactions between their constituent factors, have rapidly gained popularity in psychology. Applications of such network approaches to various psychological constructs have recently moved from a descriptive stance, in which the goal is to estimate the network structure that pertains to a construct, to a more comparative stance, in which the goal is to compare network structures across populations. However, the statistical tools to do so are lacking. In this article, we present the network comparison test (NCT), which uses resampling-based permutation testing to compare network structures from two independent, cross-sectional data sets on invariance of (a) network structure, (b) edge (connection) strength, and (c) global strength. Performance of NCT is evaluated in simulations that show NCT to perform well in various circumstances for all three tests: The Type I error rate is close to the nominal significance level, and power proves sufficiently high if sample size and difference between networks are substantial. We illustrate NCT by comparing depression symptom networks of males and females. Possible extensions of NCT are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Borkulo, C. D. V., Bork, R. V., Boschloo, L., Kossakowski, J. J., Tio, P., Schoevers, R. A., Borsboom, D., & Waldorp, L. (2022). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychological Methods, 28(6), 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476
Borkulo, Claudia D. van, et al. "Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test." Psychological Methods, vol. 28, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1273–1285, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476.
Borkulo, Claudia D. van, Riet van Bork, Lynn Boschloo, Jolanda Jacqueline Kossakowski, Pia Tio, Robert A. Schoevers, Denny Borsboom, and Lourens Waldorp. "Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test." Psychological Methods 28, no. 6 (2022): 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476.
Borkulo C. D. V., Bork R. V., Boschloo L. [и др.] Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. // Psychological Methods. — 2022. — Vol. 28, № 6. — P. 1273–1285. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476
@article{borkulo2022comparing,
title = {{Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.}},
author = {Claudia D. van Borkulo and Riet van Bork and Lynn Boschloo and Jolanda Jacqueline Kossakowski and Pia Tio and Robert A. Schoevers and Denny Borsboom and Lourens Waldorp},
journal = {Psychological Methods},
year = {2022},
volume = {28},
number = {6},
pages = {1273--1285},
doi = {10.1037/met0000476},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476}
}TY - JOUR AU - Borkulo, Claudia D. van AU - Bork, Riet van AU - Boschloo, Lynn AU - Kossakowski, Jolanda Jacqueline AU - Tio, Pia AU - Schoevers, Robert A. AU - Borsboom, Denny AU - Waldorp, Lourens TI - Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. JO - Psychological Methods VL - 28 IS - 6 SP - 1273 EP - 1285 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/04/11 DO - 10.1037/met0000476 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.