One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Matthew B. Ross, Britta M. Glennon, Raviv Murciano-Goroff, Enrico G. Berkes, Bruce A. Weinberg, Julia Ingrid Lane
There is a well-documented gap between the observed number of works produced by women and by men in science, with clear consequences for the retention and promotion of women 1 . The gap might be a result of productivity differences 2–5 , or it might be owing to women’s contributions not being acknowledged 6,7 . Here we find that at least part of this gap is the result of unacknowledged contributions: women in research teams are significantly less likely than men to be credited with authorship. The findings are consistent across three very different sources of data. Analysis of the first source—large-scale administrative data on research teams, team scientific output and attribution of credit—show that women are significantly less likely to be named on a given article or patent produced by their team relative to their male peers. The gender gap in attribution is present across most scientific fields and almost all career stages. The second source—an extensive survey of authors—similarly shows that women’s scientific contributions are systematically less likely to be recognized. The third source—qualitative responses—suggests that the reason that women are less likely to be credited is because their work is often not known, is not appreciated or is ignored. At least some of the observed gender gap in scientific output may be owing not to differences in scientific contribution, but rather to differences in attribution.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Ross, M. B., Glennon, B. M., Murciano-Goroff, R., Berkes, E. G., Weinberg, B. A., & Lane, J. I. (2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, 608(7921), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w
Ross, Matthew B., et al. "Women are credited less in science than men." Nature, vol. 608, no. 7921, 2022, pp. 135–145, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w.
Ross, Matthew B., Britta M. Glennon, Raviv Murciano-Goroff, Enrico G. Berkes, Bruce A. Weinberg, and Julia Ingrid Lane. "Women are credited less in science than men." Nature 608, no. 7921 (2022): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w.
Ross M. B., Glennon B. M., Murciano-Goroff R. [и др.] Women are credited less in science than men // Nature. — 2022. — Vol. 608, № 7921. — P. 135–145. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w
@article{ross2022women,
title = {{Women are credited less in science than men}},
author = {Matthew B. Ross and Britta M. Glennon and Raviv Murciano-Goroff and Enrico G. Berkes and Bruce A. Weinberg and Julia Ingrid Lane},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2022},
volume = {608},
number = {7921},
pages = {135--145},
doi = {10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w}
}TY - JOUR AU - Ross, Matthew B. AU - Glennon, Britta M. AU - Murciano-Goroff, Raviv AU - Berkes, Enrico G. AU - Weinberg, Bruce A. AU - Lane, Julia Ingrid TI - Women are credited less in science than men JO - Nature VL - 608 IS - 7921 SP - 135 EP - 145 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/06/22 DO - 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.