One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Holly Wei, Phyllis N. Horns, Samuel F. Sears, Kun Huang, Christopher M. Smith, Trent L. Wei
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a practice model to promote healthcare quality. Since the World Health Organization highlighted the importance of IPC in 2010, a large volume of IPC-related research has been published. Multiple systematic reviews have been conducted to synthesize the literature from varying perspectives. Although systematic reviews are a compelling approach to synthesizing primary research, a systematic meta-review was needed to summarize the systematic reviews to offer information for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers. This systematic meta-review was designed to synthesize the systematic reviews of IPC, emphasizing the IPC-related facilitators, barriers, and outcomes between 2010 and 2020. An electronic search for systematic reviews was performed in December 2020. The databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Thirty-six systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Factors facilitating or impeding IPC were classified into three levels: organization, team, and individual. Major outcomes related to patients, healthcare professionals, and organizations. The facilitators, barriers, and outcomes are mutually interrelated. Highly effective collaboration is a process from relationship building to working together and collaborating. Improving IPC requires organizational, teams, and individuals' combined efforts. When highly effective collaborations occur, all stakeholders can benefit - organizations, professionals, and patients.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Wei, H., Horns, P. N., Sears, S. F., Huang, K., Smith, C. M., & Wei, T. L. (2022). A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(5), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975
Wei, Holly, et al. "A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes." Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 36, no. 5, 2022, pp. 735–749, https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975.
Wei, Holly, Phyllis N. Horns, Samuel F. Sears, Kun Huang, Christopher M. Smith, and Trent L. Wei. "A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes." Journal of Interprofessional Care 36, no. 5 (2022): 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975.
Wei H., Horns P. N., Sears S. F. [и др.] A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes // Journal of Interprofessional Care. — 2022. — Vol. 36, № 5. — P. 735–749. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975
@article{wei2022systematic,
title = {{A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes}},
author = {Holly Wei and Phyllis N. Horns and Samuel F. Sears and Kun Huang and Christopher M. Smith and Trent L. Wei},
journal = {Journal of Interprofessional Care},
year = {2022},
volume = {36},
number = {5},
pages = {735--749},
doi = {10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975}
}TY - JOUR AU - Wei, Holly AU - Horns, Phyllis N. AU - Sears, Samuel F. AU - Huang, Kun AU - Smith, Christopher M. AU - Wei, Trent L. TI - A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care VL - 36 IS - 5 SP - 735 EP - 749 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/02/06 DO - 10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex. Find Research links only to legal copies.