One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Jerry J. Sweet, Robert L. Heilbronner, Joel E. Morgan, Glenn J. Larrabee, Martin L. Rohling, Kyle Brauer Boone, Michael W. Kirkwood, Ryan W. Schroeder, Julie A. Suhr, Conference Participants
Objective: Citation and download data pertaining to the 2009 AACN consensus statement on validity assessment indicated that the topic maintained high interest in subsequent years, during which key terminology evolved and relevant empirical research proliferated. With a general goal of providing current guidance to the clinical neuropsychology community regarding this important topic, the specific update goals were to: identify current key definitions of terms relevant to validity assessment; learn what experts believe should be reaffirmed from the original consensus paper, as well as new consensus points; and incorporate the latest recommendations regarding the use of validity testing, as well as current application of the term ‘malingering.’ Methods: In the spring of 2019, four of the original 2009 work group chairs and additional experts for each work group were impaneled. A total of 20 individuals shared ideas and writing drafts until reaching consensus on January 21, 2021. Results: Consensus was reached regarding affirmation of prior salient points that continue to garner clinical and scientific support, as well as creation of new points. The resulting consensus statement addresses definitions and differential diagnosis, performance and symptom validity assessment, and research design and statistical issues. Conclusions/Importance: In order to provide bases for diagnoses and interpretations, the current consensus is that all clinical and forensic evaluations must proactively address the degree to which results of neuropsychological and psychological testing are valid. There is a strong and continually-growing evidence-based literature on which practitioners can confidently base their judgments regarding the selection and interpretation of validity measures.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Participants, C. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
Sweet, Jerry J., et al. "American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering." The Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 35, no. 6, 2021, pp. 1053–1106, https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036.
Sweet, Jerry J., Robert L. Heilbronner, Joel E. Morgan, Glenn J. Larrabee, Martin L. Rohling, Kyle Brauer Boone, Michael W. Kirkwood, Ryan W. Schroeder, Julie A. Suhr, and Conference Participants. "American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering." The Clinical Neuropsychologist 35, no. 6 (2021): 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036.
Sweet J. J., Heilbronner R. L., Morgan J. E. [и др.] American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. — 2021. — Vol. 35, № 6. — P. 1053–1106. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
@article{sweet2021american,
title = {{American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering}},
author = {Jerry J. Sweet and Robert L. Heilbronner and Joel E. Morgan and Glenn J. Larrabee and Martin L. Rohling and Kyle Brauer Boone and Michael W. Kirkwood and Ryan W. Schroeder and Julie A. Suhr and Conference Participants},
journal = {The Clinical Neuropsychologist},
year = {2021},
volume = {35},
number = {6},
pages = {1053--1106},
doi = {10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036}
}TY - JOUR AU - Sweet, Jerry J. AU - Heilbronner, Robert L. AU - Morgan, Joel E. AU - Larrabee, Glenn J. AU - Rohling, Martin L. AU - Boone, Kyle Brauer AU - Kirkwood, Michael W. AU - Schroeder, Ryan W. AU - Suhr, Julie A. AU - Participants, Conference TI - American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering JO - The Clinical Neuropsychologist VL - 35 IS - 6 SP - 1053 EP - 1106 PY - 2021 DA - 2021/04/06 DO - 10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.