One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Micah D.J. Peters, Christina M. Godfrey, Patricia A. McInerney, Hanan Khalil, Palle Larsen, Casey Marnie, Danielle Pollock, Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to clearly describe how to develop a robust and detailed scoping review protocol, which is the first stage of the scoping review process. This paper provides detailed guidance and a checklist for prospective authors to ensure that their protocols adequately inform both the conduct of the ensuing review and their readership. INTRODUCTION: Scoping reviews are a common approach to evidence synthesis for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers across a variety of fields. Scoping reviews are not concerned with making analytical comparisons based on pooling results data from multiple primary sources of evidence, but rather on collating and describing the evidence and presenting the summation in a clearly illustrated format. Methods for undertaking and reporting scoping reviews continue to be refined. Some prospective reviewers may be uncertain how to plan, structure, and report scoping review protocols, as there is little or no specific guidance for scoping review protocols yet available. METHODS: This guidance was developed by members of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group based on previous experience and expertise in developing scoping review and evidence synthesis methodologies, protocols, and reviews, as well as through experiences working with and guiding authors to develop scoping review protocols. Elements of a comprehensive scoping review protocol are outlined and explained in detail. CONCLUSION: Knowledge users of evidence syntheses rely on clear and transparent reporting to understand and use the results of published work to drive evidence-based improvements within health care and beyond. It is hoped that readers will be able to use this guidance when developing protocols to assist them in planning future scoping reviews and to carry them out with a high degree of transparency.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P. A., Khalil, H., Larsen, P., Marnie, C., Pollock, D., Tricco, A. C., & Munn, Z. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242
Peters, Micah D.J., et al. "Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols." JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 20, no. 4, 2022, pp. 953–968, https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242.
Peters, Micah D.J., Christina M. Godfrey, Patricia A. McInerney, Hanan Khalil, Palle Larsen, Casey Marnie, Danielle Pollock, Andrea C. Tricco, and Zachary Munn. "Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols." JBI Evidence Synthesis 20, no. 4 (2022): 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242.
Peters M. D., Godfrey C. M., McInerney P. A. [и др.] Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols // JBI Evidence Synthesis. — 2022. — Vol. 20, № 4. — P. 953–968. — URL: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242
@article{peters2022best,
title = {{Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols}},
author = {Micah D.J. Peters and Christina M. Godfrey and Patricia A. McInerney and Hanan Khalil and Palle Larsen and Casey Marnie and Danielle Pollock and Andrea C. Tricco and Zachary Munn},
journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
year = {2022},
volume = {20},
number = {4},
pages = {953--968},
doi = {10.11124/jbies-21-00242},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242}
}TY - JOUR AU - Peters, Micah D.J. AU - Godfrey, Christina M. AU - McInerney, Patricia A. AU - Khalil, Hanan AU - Larsen, Palle AU - Marnie, Casey AU - Pollock, Danielle AU - Tricco, Andrea C. AU - Munn, Zachary TI - Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols JO - JBI Evidence Synthesis VL - 20 IS - 4 SP - 953 EP - 968 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/02/01 DO - 10.11124/jbies-21-00242 UR - https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex. Find Research links only to legal copies.