One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Lindsay J. Marshall, Jarrod Bailey, Manuela Cassotta, Kathrin Herrmann, Francesca Pistollato
The failure rate for the translation of drugs from animal testing to human treatments remains at over 92%, where it has been for the past few decades. The majority of these failures are due to unexpected toxicity - that is, safety issues revealed in human trials that were not apparent in animal tests - or lack of efficacy. However, the use of more innovative tools, such as organs-on-chips, in the preclinical pipeline for drug testing, has revealed that these tools are more able to predict unexpected safety events prior to clinical trials and so can be used for this, as well as for efficacy testing. Here, we review several disease areas, and consider how the use of animal models has failed to offer effective new treatments. We also make some suggestions as to how the more human-relevant new approach methodologies might be applied to address this.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Marshall, L. J., Bailey, J., Cassotta, M., Herrmann, K., & Pistollato, F. (2023). Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 51(2), 102–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756
Marshall, Lindsay J., et al. "Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review." Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 51, no. 2, 2023, pp. 102–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756.
Marshall, Lindsay J., Jarrod Bailey, Manuela Cassotta, Kathrin Herrmann, and Francesca Pistollato. "Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review." Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 51, no. 2 (2023): 102–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756.
Marshall L. J., Bailey J., Cassotta M. [и др.] Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review // Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. — 2023. — Vol. 51, № 2. — P. 102–135. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756
@article{marshall2023poor,
title = {{Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review}},
author = {Lindsay J. Marshall and Jarrod Bailey and Manuela Cassotta and Kathrin Herrmann and Francesca Pistollato},
journal = {Alternatives to Laboratory Animals},
year = {2023},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {102--135},
doi = {10.1177/02611929231157756},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756}
}TY - JOUR AU - Marshall, Lindsay J. AU - Bailey, Jarrod AU - Cassotta, Manuela AU - Herrmann, Kathrin AU - Pistollato, Francesca TI - Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review JO - Alternatives to Laboratory Animals VL - 51 IS - 2 SP - 102 EP - 135 PY - 2023 DA - 2023/03/01 DO - 10.1177/02611929231157756 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929231157756 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.