One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Anto Čartolovni, Minna Stolt, P. Anne Scott, Riitta Suhonen
Moral injury emerged in the healthcare discussion quite recently because of the difficulties and challenges healthcare workers and healthcare systems face in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral injury involves a deep emotional wound and is unique to those who bear witness to intense human suffering and cruelty. This article aims to synthesise the very limited evidence from empirical studies on moral injury and to discuss a better understanding of the concept of moral injury, its importance in the healthcare context and its relation to the well-known concept of moral distress. A scoping literature review design was used to support the discussion. Systematic literature searches conducted in April 2020 in two electronic databases, PubMed/Medline and PsychInfo, produced 2044 hits but only a handful of empirical papers, from which seven well-focused articles were identified. The concept of moral injury was considered under other concepts as well such as stress of conscience, regrets for ethical situation, moral distress and ethical suffering, guilt without fault, and existential suffering with inflicting pain. Nurses had witnessed these difficult ethical situations when faced with unnecessary patient suffering and a feeling of not doing enough. Some cases of moral distress may turn into moral residue and end in moral injury with time, and in certain circumstances and contexts. The association between these concepts needs further investigation and confirmation through empirical studies; in particular, where to draw the line as to when moral distress turns into moral injury, leading to severe consequences. Given the very limited research on moral injury, discussion of moral injury in the context of the duty to care, for example, in this pandemic settings and similar situations warrants some consideration.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Čartolovni, A., Stolt, M., Scott, P. A., & Suhonen, R. (2021). Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion. Nursing Ethics, 28(5), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776
Čartolovni, Anto, et al. "Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion." Nursing Ethics, vol. 28, no. 5, 2021, pp. 590–602, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776.
Čartolovni, Anto, Minna Stolt, P. Anne Scott, and Riitta Suhonen. "Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion." Nursing Ethics 28, no. 5 (2021): 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776.
Čartolovni A., Stolt M., Scott P. A. [и др.] Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion // Nursing Ethics. — 2021. — Vol. 28, № 5. — P. 590–602. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776
@article{cartolovni2021moral,
title = {{Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion}},
author = {Anto Čartolovni and Minna Stolt and P. Anne Scott and Riitta Suhonen},
journal = {Nursing Ethics},
year = {2021},
volume = {28},
number = {5},
pages = {590--602},
doi = {10.1177/0969733020966776},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776}
}TY - JOUR AU - Čartolovni, Anto AU - Stolt, Minna AU - Scott, P. Anne AU - Suhonen, Riitta TI - Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion JO - Nursing Ethics VL - 28 IS - 5 SP - 590 EP - 602 PY - 2021 DA - 2021/01/11 DO - 10.1177/0969733020966776 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.