One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Cornelia Wrzus, Andreas B. Neubauer
Ecological Momentary Assessments (i.e., EMA, repeated assessments in daily life) are widespread in many fields of psychology and related disciplines. Yet, little knowledge exists on how differences in study designs and samples predict study compliance and dropout—two central parameters of data quality in (micro-)longitudinal research. The current meta-analysis included k = 477 articles (496 samples, total N = 677,536). For each article, we coded the design, sample characteristics, compliance, and dropout rate. The results showed that on average EMA studies scheduled six assessments per day, lasted for 7 days, and obtained a compliance of 79%. Studies with more assessments per day scheduled fewer assessment days, yet, the number of assessments did not predict compliance or dropout rates. Compliance was significantly higher in studies providing financial incentives. Otherwise, design or sample characteristics had little effects. We discuss the implications of the findings for planning, reporting, and reviewing EMA studies.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Wrzus, C., & Neubauer, A. B. (2022). Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields. Assessment, 30(3), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538
Wrzus, Cornelia, and Andreas B. Neubauer. "Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields." Assessment, vol. 30, no. 3, 2022, pp. 825–846, https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538.
Wrzus, Cornelia, and Andreas B. Neubauer. "Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields." Assessment 30, no. 3 (2022): 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538.
Wrzus C., Neubauer A. B. Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields // Assessment. — 2022. — Vol. 30, № 3. — P. 825–846. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538
@article{wrzus2022ecological,
title = {{Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields}},
author = {Cornelia Wrzus and Andreas B. Neubauer},
journal = {Assessment},
year = {2022},
volume = {30},
number = {3},
pages = {825--846},
doi = {10.1177/10731911211067538},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538}
}TY - JOUR AU - Wrzus, Cornelia AU - Neubauer, Andreas B. TI - Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields JO - Assessment VL - 30 IS - 3 SP - 825 EP - 846 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/01/11 DO - 10.1177/10731911211067538 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.