- Published
- 2022-06-20
- Venue
- Global Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1624-1626
- Cited by
- 528
- Open access
- Yes, gold
- DOI
- 10.1177/21925682221110527
- PubMed
- 35723546
Cite this paper
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
- APA 7
Dettori, J. R., Norvell, D. C., & Chapman, J. R. (2022). Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider. Global Spine Journal, 12(7), 1624–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527
- MLA 9
Dettori, Joseph R., et al. "Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider." Global Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, 2022, pp. 1624–1626, https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527.
- Chicago
Dettori, Joseph R., Daniel C. Norvell, and Jens Robert Chapman. "Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider." Global Spine Journal 12, no. 7 (2022): 1624–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527.
- GOST
Dettori J. R., Norvell D. C., Chapman J. R. Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider // Global Spine Journal. — 2022. — Vol. 12, № 7. — P. 1624–1626. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527
- BibTeX
@article{dettori2022fixedeffect, title = {{Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider}}, author = {Joseph R. Dettori and Daniel C. Norvell and Jens Robert Chapman}, journal = {Global Spine Journal}, year = {2022}, volume = {12}, number = {7}, pages = {1624--1626}, doi = {10.1177/21925682221110527}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527} }- RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Dettori, Joseph R. AU - Norvell, Daniel C. AU - Chapman, Jens Robert TI - Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider JO - Global Spine Journal VL - 12 IS - 7 SP - 1624 EP - 1626 PY - 2022 DA - 2022/06/20 DO - 10.1177/21925682221110527 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 ER -
Ask Claude about this paper
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
- “Summarize doi:10.1177/21925682221110527 and list its main limitations.”
- “Find newer studies that test the same question, with free PDFs.”
- “Cite this and five related papers in APA for my literature review.”
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.