One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Enola K. Proctor, Alicia C. Bunger, Rebecca Lengnick‐Hall, Donald R. Gerke, Jared K. Martin, Rebecca J. Phillips, Julia C. Swanson
BACKGROUND: Proctor and colleagues' 2011 paper proposed a taxonomy of eight implementation outcomes and challenged the field to address a research agenda focused on conceptualization, measurement, and theory building. Ten years later, this paper maps the field's progress in implementation outcomes research. This scoping review describes how each implementation outcome has been studied, research designs and methods used, and the contexts and settings represented in the current literature. We also describe the role of implementation outcomes in relation to implementation strategies and other outcomes. METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews guided our methods. Using forward citation tracing, we identified all literature citing the 2011 paper. We conducted our search in the Web of Science (WOS) database and added citation alerts sent to the first author from the publisher for a 6-month period coinciding with the WOS citation search. This produced 1346 titles and abstracts. Initial abstract screening yielded 480 manuscripts, and full-text review yielded 400 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria (empirical assessment of at least one implementation outcome). RESULTS: Slightly more than half (52.1%) of included manuscripts examined acceptability. Fidelity (39.3%), feasibility (38.6%), adoption (26.5%), and appropriateness (21.8%) were also commonly examined. Penetration (16.0%), sustainability (15.8%), and cost (7.8%) were less frequently examined. Thirty-two manuscripts examined implementation outcomes not included in the original taxonomy. Most studies took place in healthcare (45.8%) or behavioral health (22.5%) organizations. Two-thirds used observational designs. We found little evidence of progress in testing the relationships between implementation strategies and implementation outcomes, leaving us ill-prepared to know how to achieve implementation success. Moreover, few studies tested the impact of implementation outcomes on other important outcome types, such as service systems and improved individual or population health. CONCLUSIONS: Our review presents a comprehensive snapshot of the research questions being addressed by existing implementation outcomes literature and reveals the need for rigorous, analytic research and tests of strategies for attaining implementation outcomes in the next 10 years of outcomes research.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Proctor, E. K., Bunger, A. C., Lengnick‐Hall, R., Gerke, D. R., Martin, J. K., Phillips, R. J., & Swanson, J. C. (2023). Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
Proctor, Enola K., et al. "Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review." Implementation Science, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, pp. 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
Proctor, Enola K., Alicia C. Bunger, Rebecca Lengnick‐Hall, Donald R. Gerke, Jared K. Martin, Rebecca J. Phillips, and Julia C. Swanson. "Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review." Implementation Science 18, no. 1 (2023): 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
Proctor E. K., Bunger A. C., Lengnick‐Hall R. [и др.] Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review // Implementation Science. — 2023. — Vol. 18, № 1. — P. 31. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
@article{proctor2023years,
title = {{Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review}},
author = {Enola K. Proctor and Alicia C. Bunger and Rebecca Lengnick‐Hall and Donald R. Gerke and Jared K. Martin and Rebecca J. Phillips and Julia C. Swanson},
journal = {Implementation Science},
year = {2023},
volume = {18},
number = {1},
pages = {31},
doi = {10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z}
}TY - JOUR AU - Proctor, Enola K. AU - Bunger, Alicia C. AU - Lengnick‐Hall, Rebecca AU - Gerke, Donald R. AU - Martin, Jared K. AU - Phillips, Rebecca J. AU - Swanson, Julia C. TI - Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review JO - Implementation Science VL - 18 IS - 1 SP - 31 PY - 2023 DA - 2023/07/25 DO - 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.