One connector, four scholarly indexes, real DOIs and legal free PDFs. Works in Claude and ChatGPT.
Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. 3-day free trial.
Prashant Nasa, Ravi Jain, Deven Juneja
The Delphi technique is a systematic process of forecasting using the collective opinion of panel members. The structured method of developing consensus among panel members using Delphi methodology has gained acceptance in diverse fields of medicine. The Delphi methods assumed a pivotal role in the last few decades to develop best practice guidance using collective intelligence where research is limited, ethically/logistically difficult or evidence is conflicting. However, the attempts to assess the quality standard of Delphi studies have reported significant variance, and details of the process followed are usually unclear. We recommend systematic quality tools for evaluation of Delphi methodology; identification of problem area of research, selection of panel, anonymity of panelists, controlled feedback, iterative Delphi rounds, consensus criteria, analysis of consensus, closing criteria, and stability of the results. Based on these nine qualitative evaluation points, we assessed the quality of Delphi studies in the medical field related to coronavirus disease 2019. There was inconsistency in reporting vital elements of Delphi methods such as identification of panel members, defining consensus, closing criteria for rounds, and presenting the results. We propose our evaluation points for researchers, medical journal editorial boards, and reviewers to evaluate the quality of the Delphi methods in healthcare research.
Formatted from the source metadata, not typed by hand. For a whole reference list, use the citation generator or ask your assistant through Find Research.
Nasa, P., Jain, R., & Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
Nasa, Prashant, et al. "Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness." World Journal of Methodology, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, pp. 116–129, https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
Nasa, Prashant, Ravi Jain, and Deven Juneja. "Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness." World Journal of Methodology 11, no. 4 (2021): 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
Nasa P., Jain R., Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness // World Journal of Methodology. — 2021. — Vol. 11, № 4. — P. 116–129. — URL: https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
@article{nasa2021delphi,
title = {{Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness}},
author = {Prashant Nasa and Ravi Jain and Deven Juneja},
journal = {World Journal of Methodology},
year = {2021},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {116--129},
doi = {10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116}
}TY - JOUR AU - Nasa, Prashant AU - Jain, Ravi AU - Juneja, Deven TI - Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness JO - World Journal of Methodology VL - 11 IS - 4 SP - 116 EP - 129 PY - 2021 DA - 2021/07/18 DO - 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116 UR - https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116 ER -
Add Find Research to Claude or ChatGPT and ask in plain language. The assistant reads this record, finds the papers around it and cites only what it actually found:
Setup takes about a minute: add the connector, then start the free trial.
Record from OpenAlex; open-access location from Unpaywall and the indexes. Find Research links only to legal copies.